Pros and Cons of Radiological Testing - 1232 Words

Radiological Testing Pros Cons There are two very divergent viewpoints across the medical provider landscape as to whether radiological testing is used too much or not enough. The basic equation comes down to a balance between being sure that certain conditions and disorders are not in play and not wasting time/money and/or exposing the patient to potential harm due to the fairly dangerous nature of being exposed to too much radiation. Pros for Radiological Testing Proponents of radiological testing often state that most people rarely if ever get radiological testing so the possibility of harm from the testing alone is exceedingly rare. They will often point to more exposure happening at an airport than happens with a doctor in a given year for the average person. Another similar viewpoint is that because exposure to radiation is minimal and rare, that testing should be used to quickly rule out certain disorders and diseases since radiological screening is usually fairly quick and basic. Others still point to the fact that testing or not testing can literally come down to life and death and that doctors and other health professionals should rely on hard verifiable facts rather than rolling the dice and hoping for the best. Some take this a step further and say that doctors really have to do all applicable tests, including radiological testing, because they stand to get sued for millions of dollars if they skip a te st that would have conceivably revealed theShow MoreRelatedPrescription Drug User Act ( Pdufa )844 Words   |  4 Pages1999–2011, 100 FDA-priority review pharmaceuticals were approved by both the FDA and the EMA. The majority of the products were ï ¬ rst submitted to and approved by the FDA. The FDA has a signiï ¬ cantly shorter drug application review time than the EMA. Pros of Priority Review Speeding therapy to patients - The most prominent possible upside would be speed in the form of getting new therapies into patients more quickly. Helping American competitiveness -A second positive, depending on one’s perspectiveRead MoreNuclear Weapon Funding in US Defense Budget2070 Words   |  9 Pagesalso requested $108 million less than was appropriated last year for the Global Threat Reduction Initiative; this is a program that actually plays a key part in the â€Å"Energy Department’s effort at preventing terrorist from obtaining nuclear and radiological materials that could be used in weapons of mass destruction† (Silverberg). Should the U.S. Congress amend the D.O.D. Appropriations Act of 2015 to eliminate funding for nuclear weapons production? â€Å"President Obama’s FY2014 base budget requestRead MoreManaging Information Technology (7th Edition)239873 Words   |  960 Pagesquestions for each chapter in this textbook. The Test Item File is available in Microsoft Word and for use with the computerized Prentice Hall TestGen, as well as WebCT and Blackboard-ready conversions. TestGen is a comprehensive suite of tools for testing and assessment. Screen wizards and full technical support are available to instructors to help them create and distribute tests to their students, either by printing and distributing through traditional methods or by online delivery. Preface Read MoreEssay Paper84499 Words   |  338 Pagesaccordance with AR 220–1, chapter 4, paragraph 10, subparagraph E (PSPER nonavailable report). (2) Active Army will report qualifying convictions using assignment consideration code L9 (Lautenberg Amendment). Army Reserve will enter Lautenberg data as ASG–CONS L9 in T APDB–R, database table IAF–T. Refer to current MILPER messages for further guidance. (3) The ARNG Directorate (NG–ARH–S) will report for ARNG. The Army Reserve command will report for the USAR. Biannual reports will be made (15 January)